A link to the text is below, a well as my own thoughts about this issue, and the rise of overt racism and other divisive tactics by “conservative leadership.”I hope you enjoy them.

 Ed

  Senator Webb’s Editorial in the Wall Street Journal

First off, “privilege” isn’t about wealth per se, it’s about living without fear.  Most white people never experience that fear, unless they are in the minority (like if your car breaks down in a “non white” neighborhood, particularly after dark).  People of color live with that fear 24/7 in most of this country.

 On the plantation, and in the post civil war era that leads up to today, the game has been the same, pit one group/race against another, “Massah” always wins.  This goes all the way back to plantations having white overseers, who were usually Irish, also brought in as “indentured servants.”  Their descendants would swell the ranks of the KKK and other “White Supremacy” groups later on.

 I agree with many of the statistical comments made by senator Webb.  He misses a larger point, Scotch-Irish (Southern White) culture has always eschewed “book learning” and discouraged it’s children from seeking higher education.  In my own family, my mother, who was reared by a sharecropping single mother, was the only one of her six siblings to get more than a 3rd grade education.  My mother finished high school (on scholarship at a boarding school operated by the Georgia Federation of Women’s Clubs) and her mother disowned her for leaving home at 15 to do so.  I am the first and only to finish college of my siblings.

 My aunt Velma, her daughter’s father in law,   my maternal grandmother Nancy Garner, and my aunt Frances.

  In Southern culture, devotion to “family” and “staying close to home” conspire with the values which say that “bettering one’s self” equals “social climbing” and “putting on airs” that keeps most poor southern whites from completing college, or remaining “ignorant” even if one finishes college.

 I have cousins who completed higher degrees, one has a Master’s in philosophy from Harvard, who all still talk very “country” and who prefer their slow and narrow way of thinking and living.  I don’t begrudge them this, but I learned early in my life that I had to accept my father’s half-Jewish genetics and that included a highly inquisitive mind for which slow and narrow would assure boredom and depression.  In other words, I made peace with my inner “New Yorker.”

My father’s birth certificate.  He changed his name to his step father’s last name “Garren” when he was five because “Edward V. Garren” sounded more “American.” 

It is a fear of expanding, of anything new or from “outside.”  It is formed and nurtured by the Southern Baptist Church (and it’s evangelically related cousins).  It is a spiritual way of life that has a clear pecking order, that says that only “people like us” are safe, and the rest are not deserving of God’s grace, kindness, or generosity, and it is killing our country. 

To take this even further, senator Webb misses an even bigger point, we don’t really value education in this country.  If we did, our funding for education wouldn’t be at the lowest point in decades.  40 years ago, when I was in college, most of the cost was paid by the federal government.  I graduated with less than $4,000 in debt.

 Now, a student can spend twenty times that just completing a Bachelors degree, because the government doesn’t want our kids to complete college.  It’s easier to manipulate ignorant people.

 ALL of this recent chatter is part of the larger smoke screen that obscures the largest military industry and war spending in the history of the world.  Doesn’t anyone notice that this stuff always “drops” just when they need to distract the public away from something else?  The FACT that the Democrats passed an extension for unemployment was lost in the media with all of the drama about Ms. Sherrod, the tea party and the NAACP.  They ALWAYS do this folks !!!  Wake up and smell the coffee!!!  It’s the oldest game in the business.   Make a distraction at one end of the store, while someone else raids the cash register.

 The Republicans have been doing this since 9/11 and the “War on Terror.”  In case no one noticed, the Obama administration and congress announced that it did not intend to extend the Bush era tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans either.  All of this hoopla over Ms. Sherrod has kept that story out of the news too.  You can bet that any opportunity for the Obama administration to get some GOOD press will be quickly distracted by their gigantic “spin” machine.

 Frank Rich put it best in a recent column: ”None of this legacy, much of it accessible to anyone who wanted to look (or ask), prevented the tarring of Shirley Sherrod last week. And it all unfolded while the country was ostentatiously marking the 50th anniversary of “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

 If we are to learn anything from this travesty, it might help to retrace the racial soap opera that immediately preceded and provoked it. That story began on July 13, when the N.A.A.C.P. passed a resolution calling on the Tea Party to expel “racist elements” in its ranks. No sooner had Tea Party adherents and defenders angrily denied that such elements amounted to anything more than a few fringe nuts than Mark Williams, the spokesman and past chairman of the Tea Party Express, piped up. He slapped a “parody” on the Web — a letter from “colored people” to Abraham Lincoln berating him as “the greatest racist ever” and complaining about “that whole emancipation thing” because “freedom means having to work for real.”

 Williams had hurled similar slurs for months, but now that the N.A.A.C.P. had cast a spotlight on the Tea Party’s racist elements, he was belatedly excommunicated by the leader of another Tea Party organization. In truth, it’s not clear that any group in this scattered movement has authority over any other. But one thing was certain: the N.A.A.C.P. was wrong to demand that the Tea Party disown its racist fringe. It should have made that demand of the G.O.P. instead.

 The Tea Party Express fronted by Williams is an indisputable Republican subsidiary. It was created by prominent G.O.P. political consultants in California and raises money for G.O.P. candidates, including Sharron Angle, Harry Reid’s Senate opponent in Nevada. But Republican leaders, presiding over a Congressional delegation with no blacks and a party that nearly mirrors it, remain in hiding whenever racial controversies break out under their tent. “I am not interested in getting into that debate,” said Mitch McConnell last week.

 Once Williams was disowned by other Tea Partiers, Breitbart posted the bogus Sherrod video as revenge under the headline “Video Proof: The NAACP Awards Racism.” To portray whites as the victims of racist blacks has been a weapon of the right from the moment desegregation started to empower previously subjugated minorities in the 1960s. But its deployment has accelerated with the ascent of a black president. The pace is set by right-wing stars like Glenn Beck, who on Fox branded Barack Obama a racist with “a deep-seated hatred for white people,” and the ever-opportunistic Newt Gingrich, who on Twitter maligned Sonia Sotomayor as a “Latina woman racist.”

 The worst part of all this is that “we Democrats” confuse the ability to engage in academic “debate” with real wisdom, intelligence or action.  We think that because we are “on top of an issue” in terms of “talk forums” or other media chatter, that we are in the stronger position.  That’s not how life works.  The reality is that whoever wins, wins.  And while it’s important to “play the game”, it’s also important to win, particularly when you’re facing up to a bully, which is what the Republican leadership has become, lying bullies who stop at nothing until they win.  We have decades of this in our recent history (since 1980), yet we continue to hide behind academic debate, and hope the rest of the country is listening.

 Well, it isn’t listening.  The rest of the country has been systematically reduced to sound bytes, a fifth or sixth grade reading level, and a greater appreciation for the Super Bowl than the State of the Union.  The Republicans have figured that out, what’s our problem?  We need a lot more of our folks to take lessons from Congressman Alan Grayson (the guy from Florida who did the “Republican Health Care Plan, “Don’t get sick, and if you do, just die”). All this “Bi-partisanship” is the legislative equivalent of date rape.  We have the botched “health care reform” without a public option to demonstrate that.

 Instead of compromising on the Public Option, we should have kept it, let the Republicans in the senate filibuster, and show the public just who they really are, privileged WASP men and women who benefit from the old social order.  But as usual, instead of taking the courageous stand on behalf of the American people, we caved in.  And we wonder WHY the electorate has no respect for us (Democrats)?

 When we “compromise” on important things, we prove the Republicans right, that government doesn’t work, and that it doesn’t matter who you vote for.

 We should be talking about how the Republicans in the senate were willing to throw millions of people to the wolves by denying them unemployment benefits (extension), but never object to increased war spending.  We should be talking about how under Bush, the very wealthy in this country have not paid their “fair share” of taxes to support a war they are making money off of.

 We also need to educate people that politics is not about morality, it’s about power.  My 97 year old mother said it best decades ago, “Politics is a dirty business, and most politicians are crooks.  But at least the Democrats are OUR crooks.”

My mother, Lois Edna Verner Ramsay-Garren, at 95.

She lived through the 20s, the Great Depression, WWII and like most of her generation, valued the “New Deal” politics that re-aligned wealth in this country by making sure that “working people” got a fair wage, decent benefits, Social Security, their children got a GOOD public education, and that the money they put into savings wasn’t squandered away by some stock deal gone mad.  Her other favorite quote, “I’m not wealthy enough to vote Republican.”

 The Reagan/Bush/Gingrich/Bush decades have systematically dismantled the “New Deal” which is why the economics in this country recently looked a lot like 1928 until it all came crashing down, and now the economy looks too much like 1931.

 For the sake of the future of not just the country, but the planet, we Democrats need to get our act together or we are going to remain part of the problem, not the solution.

 Edward “Ed” Garren, MA, LMFT

Psychotherapist 

“Just come down 95 to exit #119.  There’s a Shoney’s restaurant, I’ll meet you there.”  For those who don’t spend time in the Carolina’s, Shoney’s is legendary.  For $6.99, you can get a very decent lunch, or help yourself to their extensive all you can eat buffet.  The surroundings are modern, clean, the staff is very perky and attentive, everyone eats at Shoney’s.  I got there first, and was ushered into the only booth available in the non-smoking section, a seven foot long “family” booth.  The separators between the booths are about two feet above shoulder level, Southerner’s are boisterous story tellers, and the cadences and laughter are deep and rich.  The place felt like the Overlook Cafe on Sunday after church, except louder.

Carl Jackson is a native of Manning South Carolina.  He has traveled a lot, worked in many different cities around the east coast and returned to Manning a few years ago.  He works for the Manning Times, a weekly paper that has served Clarendon County since 1882.

Carl and “Rock”

Carl was recently quoted in the New York Times article about Manning’s current famous resident, Alvin Greene.  Mr. Greene is the previously unknown gentleman who won the South Carolina Democratic Primary for the U.S. Senate.  “It is another embarrassment for South Carolina, said Carl F. Jackson Jr, a graphic designer at a local newspaper, The Clarendon Citizen. “Anybody who got beyond eighth grade is a little astounded by this,” Mr. Jackson said, adding his own theory of how Mr. Greene had won. “Maybe voters thought it was the singer, Al Green.”

New York Times Online article

 I was not aware of the celebrity status of Manning or Carl when I accepted his invitation to come for the weekend, but the entire experience turned out to be one of the most delightful travel experiences I have ever had.

Of course, the weather this time of year is hot in the day, and warm at night.  South Carolina is the Palmetto state, and the little (or not so little) “palmetto bugs” are omnipresent.  The sandy soil has an ant hill every two feet in the yards and open fields.  But the pine trees are also lush with wildlife.  In five minutes we saw cardinals, robins, stunning red crested woodpeckers (including some percussive moments as they worked on a couple of the local trees), squirrels, and at night the chorus of bull frogs, owls, cicadas, and other local fauna filled the liquid thick night air.   And the hum of the AC compressors, as well as the rattle of ceiling fans in all rooms except the bathrooms, provides a sort of electronica/nature chorus that is unique to the low country south.

The front yard which faces the lake

Carl’s home, which has been the family “lake cottage” for decades, sits on the banks of the Lake Marion, which is part of a group of lakes which were formed by the Tennessee Valley Authority to provide water to run hydroelectric power about 60 years ago.  The lakes offer recreation for the region, and the shores are dotted with homes, mostly modest dwellings, owned by working class folks.

Carl’s pontoon boat, dock and the lake

I decided I wanted a good steak for dinner, so Carl took me to a very local place, about three miles away, also on the lake bank.  I don’t remember the name of the  place, but it was pure country white folks, jeans, t-shirts, Harley’s parked outside, and karaoke for entertainment.  The tables were lined up road house style, dark lighting, smoke as thick as you could cut it, red faces, kind hearts.  The moment Carl walked in, everyone stopped to talk to him.

The conversations consisted of exchanging health information about relatives and friends, lots of “God Bless you”s, spiced with introductions of me and “Glad you’re here”s.  Lots of folks came up to put their arm around Carl and tell me what a great guy he is, “like a brother.”  Southerners are open and easy to engage.  It is ubiquitous, applies to both black and white, it is the single thing I most miss about “Dixie”, there are no strangers, just friends that have not yet met.

I ordered a 14 oz. Rib Eye steak and it was one of the best steaks I’ve eaten in a long time, $14.99 with all the fixins, including slaw and hush puppies.

Carl comes from a long time Democratic family.  His mother has been an elected official numerous times in the region, politics are as thick as humidity here.  The county is solidly Democratic, owing largely to it’s being 75% African American.  Like most smaller communities, everyone knows everyone, or at least it feels that way.

Carl was very clear that he will vote for Alvin Greene.  “He won fair and square, and the party should support him.”  Today on CNN, I heard that the Democratic Party of South Carolina has decided not to contest Mr. Greene’s candidacy.  I suspect within a month or so, once the shock has worn off, the party will actively support Mr. Greene.  In a state of “Yellow Dog Democrats”, the thought of “payback” to the Republican party for decades of Strom Thurmond may prove too irresistible.

Certainly the south is now the most racially “open” region in the country, a place where African Americans have been a significant part of the landscape since the first colonists landed.  In terms of the November election, my money is on Alvin Greene.  I think there are so many people in this country who are disgusted with the political status quo in DC, the idea of electing someone who is truly “one of us” may trump all the usual political expectations and predictions.  Mr. Greene could very well become the Jesse Ventura of South Carolina.

I genuinely enjoyed my time with Carl, and the lifestyle in Manning and around the lake.  After the steak, I got up and sang “Cowboys are Frequently Secretly in Love with Each Other” by Willie Nelson on the karaoke machine.   I was reminded by my surroundings and my host that “working people” everywhere are kind, open, accepting and generous.  It’s only when you add some money and pretense that things start getting difficult.

I stopped at “Lanes Quick Stop” about a mile up the road on my way out.  The gas station/convenience store proudly states, “No Ethanol, Better Mileage” on it’s signs.  More importantly, ethanol free gasoline is essential to marine engines, that tend to “gunk up” their fuel systems on ethanol blended fuels.  (Oregon had to modify it’s ethanol mandate to exclude marine gasoline about a year after it started, for the same reason).  The customers in the store were a lively mix of black and white, swapping fishing stories, fish cooking recipes, dripping in “Thank You”s and “Ya’ll come back now”s.

As I sit here, back in Fayetteville, watching the sun set through the thick air, safe in my air conditioned hotel suite, Portland feels like another world.  And, of course, it is, and I miss our lovely Rose City, even if it seems that “Juneary” weather will last an eternity.  I offer this epistle in my absence for your enjoyment.  Tomorrow is another day with the kids, who are getting accustomed to the big old man in their midst, and I am learning lessons in how to be a kid that I never learned when I was one.

From the sand hills of Cumberland County North Carolina,  Edward “Ed” Garren

I want to thank all of you for your tenacious and consistent commitment to improving the very broken relationship between Law Enforcement and our community.

I lived in Miami during the 1980 riots over the beating death of Arthur McDuffie and subsequent attempt by the police to cover up their actions.  The rioting lasted three days, and left millions in property damage and about 10 people died. I lived in Los Angeles during the riots that erupted over the beating of Rodney King.   That one cost billions and dozens of people were killed. In both situations, it was NOT the specific actions of police that prompted the rioting, but two acquittals of law enforcement personnel by all white juries.  It was the breakdown of the judicial system, that protected officers, not members of long abused communities, that prompted the civil unrest.

My fear is that we are be sitting on top of a similar powder keg here in Portland, which is why we must continue with this work of reforming a police department that appears to be out of control.  I echo the statement that was made that the rank and file in the department must embrace change in order for it to be effective.

There is significant anger in this community among members of many communities who have articulated that anger very clearly at the two hearings related to this ordinance.   I know from experience that if the anger is not addressed, it will emerge in very ugly ways that will significantly damage our city’s reputation.

Lastly, I want to clarify one other point.  At the February 18 meeting of the African American Alliance at the Red Cross, I was the person who publicly asked Commissioner Saltzman if he would commit to calling in the FBI to investigate the shooting of Aaron Campbell.  I reminded all present that if this shooting had occurred in any “southern” state, FBI participation would be mandatory as required by civil rights legislation that was passed in the 1960s and 1970s.  My specific request to Dan was that he not only call in the FBI on this incident, but that he draft policy requiring FBI inclusion in any similar incident in the future. At the time, he said he thought it was an interesting idea and would consider it.

I am pleased that he decided to follow through with the FBI inclusion on this one incident, and hope that policy will be drafted to set parameters for any future events (as a part of departmental oversight).  I would suggest that the language in the civil rights legislation would offer appropriate guidelines.

It is my belief that given the history of this region with regard to race, we must adopt many of the attitudes and civil rights policies and procedures that have been in place in the “south” for almost 4o years.  Clearly they have worked in that region, and I think an honest look at our history, our current issues, and the adoption of existing policies which have worked in other parts of the country is a better solution than offering one patch job at a time, each driven by the most recent crisis.

If this was any issue related to our material infrastructure, that is what we would do.

Regards,  Edward “Ed” Garren, MA, LMFT

Psychotherapy/Consulting

A Killing on Fourth & Washington

Spoticus, the big purple octopus at 4th & Washington (downtown) is dead.  His carcass may sit on the building for a while, but the Greek Cusina closed on December 31, a victim of a series of failures and the depression.

Timing is everything, and few could have fully assessed the extent of the current economic downturn.  But Ted Papas is a survivor, and it’s not the recession that killed his restaurant, at least not the downtown one.

Two things, conspired to put a stake through the restaurant’s heart.  Mr. Papas started some renovations in his building without getting some permits, and that fell into the cross hairs of Randy Leonard’s HIT squad.

I need to be very clear that I like both men.  Randy and Ted are in many ways, very similar men.  They both are strong willed, stubborn, survivors, and “hands on”, “what you see is what you get” kind of men.  One could sit back and look at their squabbles and almost find it amusing, except for one fact that seems to have been lost in the lack of due process that prevailed in this affair.  The closing of the Greek Cusina puts about 50 people out of work.  One of them is a dear friend of mine, who was one of the first casualties.  Her job as events manager, was scheduling wedding receptions, birthday and graduation parties and such in the beautiful Minoan Room on the third floor.  Due to the renovations which had not been approved by the city, the HIT squad closed the building above the 2nd floor.  This included the Minoan Room, offices and residences.  While I understand the initial fire safety concerns that closed these facilities, what followed was premeditated suffocation.

The city decided to impose a 24 hour, 7 day a week “fire watch” on the building, ostensibly until an additional high tech smoke/fire detection system could be installed.  There was a working “sprinkler” system in the building, but apparently that  was not sufficient.  The city demanded the additional system, which was not cheap, that had an automatic alarm at the closest fire station, so that it would automatically signal either smoke or fire and send the fire department coming instantly.  In the meantime, Ted had to pay for the cost of the security guard service that patrolled his building 24/7.  Of course it was a city approved contractor, and that was not cheap, $500 a day.  But, the smoke/fire alarm system got installed, so the fire watch should have ended, right?  Well, not exactly.  For whatever reason, it remained, for over a year, it has been in place, to the tune of five hundred dollars a day.

So the price tag for the fire watch started adding up, and since Ted’s ability to earn money was significantly compromised with the closure of his biggest income source  (the Minoan Room), he couldn’t pay the bill, so the city put a lien on his property.   With the lien in place, Ted could not get the necessary financing to complete the renovations to his building to bring it under code.

Then, the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (O.L.C.C.) somehow got involved, due to alleged violations.  Suddenly, every alcohol sale had to be within the letter of the law.  One example, normally when a customer in the dining room would purchase a bottle of wine to have with their dinner, the wine would be brought to the table.   The OLCC ruled that could not happen since technically the dining room was not in the bar area, so after the server poured the glasses of wine, the bottle had to be returned to the bar.  Imagine how that went over with customers?  The OLCC was “encouraged” to place the restaurant under heightened scrutiny by the City.  That scrutiny chased away even more customers.

During all this time, I was at a couple of City sponsored meetings, and the question of a restaurant to host a meal for the group(s), I suggested the Greek Cusina.  Both times, city staff said “Aren’t they closed?”  The first time this happened was about a year ago.

So clearly, the word was out about closing the Greek Cusina around City departments.  Someone’s mind was already made up.

Because my friend was the first casualty in this war, I had a vested interest in trying to resolve it.  I talked at length with Ted, and in one of those conversations talked with a couple of City inspectors (one of whom was a police officer), and had a brief conversation with Randy Leonard.

There was a lot of passion over these issues.  In a sense, it was like dealing with two siblings who were fighting, both proud, both having a deep sense of being “right”, and both determined to prevail.  What was also clear was the City’s determination to close the Greek Cusina.  Randy had the power of his office, and his HIT Squad, Ted was just one person, trying to keep his business open.

I also need to add that I got to know a lot of people who worked for Ted over the last few years, and all of them shared about what a generous employer he was.  My friend was dealing with the declining health of her elderly mother, and Ted was always flexible, allowing her time off to deal with her mothers doctor and hospital visits.  If she needed an advance on her salary, he was there for her.   That kind of generosity, and treating employees like “family” is rare in today’s world, and the loss of it is one more aspect of this that is difficult.  If one looked at the demographic of Ted’s staff, he employed many more minority staff and people over 45 than most employers.  Being an immigrant, he understands prejudice and hunger in a much more personal way than most.  The loss of his generosity will be missed as well.

I don’t like bullies.  Part of my feelings about this relates personally to being “big enough to go bear hunting with a stick” (6′1″ and 260#), part of it is a genuine distaste for any abuse of power.  Power is a very interesting thing, the more you have of it, the less it should be used.  Sometimes people confuse passion with power, but ultimately, the person who has a lot of power shouldn’t use it to hurt others.   This urination contest between Randy and Ted has cost 50 people their livelihood, and that’s what has made me so disgusted by the situation, and specifically irritated by city leadership that used it’s power to punish rather than assist.

In the rush to “punish the evildoer”, 50 people are now out of work, and one of the landmark hospitality establishments in the city is now closed, and gone forever.

As much as one might want to place the blame at the feet of one commissioner, there are three others and the mayor.  In the midst of a depression, it is inexcusable for the city to encourage or allow the destruction of a business that employs 50 people downtown.   Moreover, if this could happen to one business, what might stop it from happening to others?

Some “back story” for those of you who may not have heard about the attempt of CRC to exclude as much public testimony as possible.

I arrived at the Port Building around 8:35 AM with Pam Naugle, a neighbor.  The sign in sheets and table were already in place, we both signed in.  Marcela Alcantar was also signing in.

The young man who was staffing the table asked us if we were going to testify, and we all said “Yes” and took the small testimony slips to fill out.  While doing so, we mentioned that we had come early to make sure that we would be first on the list to testify because we knew time would be limited.

The staffer, Dennis Sandstrom explained that there would be no order for testifying, “We’re going to put them all in this box, shuffle them around and then pick folks at random” was the explanation we were offered.  He went on to explain that the reason this method had been chosen was “It’s more democratic.”

I explained that I had a leadership position with the project (Co-Chair of the Hayden Island Plan Steering Committee, member of the Community & Environmental Justice Group) and he said that wouldn’t matter, that a decision had been made.   Several other persons were told this as well, all the way up to just before the meeting.

I called Mayor Adams and left a message for him, informing him of this issue, and also made a statement to the Channel 6.

When  the room opened up, the I heard CRC staff try to tell Channel 6 that they were not allowed to bring their cameras into the room.  I confirmed this with the cameraman on our way in, the news teams just ignored this “request” by CRC staff and went in to film anyway.

In addition, Sharon Nasset made an announcement in the room just before the meeting started, that our public testimony was being picked at random by the project

Because of the pressure exerted by all of us, and the presence of the media, the process was changed, and everyone got one minute to testify.  A staff person came to me and asked me to fill out a second slip, apparently the first one I filled out could not be found.

My name was called a second time at the very end of the testimony, but I had already spoken.  Ms. Nagle and Alcantar, the first two people to arrive, were among the last five to speak.

I share all of this because of the blatant attempt to manipulate public comment, circumvent democratic processes, and exclude the press from the meeting.  This is one more example of how CRC continues to circumvent democratic public processes in order to push through their agenda.

In the face of this, they wonder why increasing numbers of people have lost trust in the project, and are so angry about the process.

I hope that an investigation can be done to find out who at CRC ordered this protocol for the meeting, and that person can be censured in an appropriate manner, including prosecution of any laws that were broken. I am not a lawyer, but this could be considered “Conspiracy to obstruct Justice” or some other violation of public meeting laws.  Whoever ordered staff to do this needs to be held accountable, even if is just some time off without pay.

I am calling on our elected leaders to not just let this sweep under the rug, and let it go.  No matter what one’s position on the CRC, the decisions should not be made in an illegal manner, or one that specifically attempts to exclude public concern and testimony.

Regards,  Ed Garren, MA, LMFT

Candidate for Portland City Commission, seat #3

www.EdForPDX.com

503-922-0338

If only we could pass on wisdom as effectively as we pass on pathology.

The biggest challenge for a person or a society is to move from where we are,

to where we have never been.

ed@edgarren.us

www.edgarren.us

If only we could pass on wisdom as effectively as we pass on pathology.

The biggest challenge for a person or a society is to move from where we are,

to w

ed@edgarren.us

www.edgarren.us

If only we could pass on wisdom as effectively as we pass on pathology.

The biggest challenge for a person or a society is to move from where we are,

to where we have never been.

ed@edgarren.us

www.edgarren.us

If only we could pass on wisdom as effectively as we pass on pathology.

The biggest challenge for a person or a society is to move from where we are,

to where we have never been.

ed@edgarren.us

www.edgarren.us

Posted in the Oregonian on 12/02/2009 by edgarren

December 02, 2009, 9:18AM in response to the article:

“Portland police commissioner explains turnabout on cop who fired beanbag round”

Link Below:

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2009/12/portland_police_commissioner_e.html 

I worked with Law Enforcement agencies and have family members and friends who work in Law Enforcement, so while I am empathetic to how difficult and stressful the job is, how this all played out is unacceptable.

Turn the situation around, imagine a “suspect” who was acquitted of manslaughter, now involved in an assault case. “Where there is smoke, there is fire” is the usual comment. The police union is embarrassing itself, protecting someone who has been involved in two excessive force incidents.

Does anyone in the union realize that when the plaintiffs familes file lawsuits against the city and win that all of us pay for it, including them? Do they also realize that by strong arming the situation, they just further alienate citizens who feel “no confidence” with their ability to self regulate one of their own who has twice been involved in situations perceived to be excessive force, one of which related to someone’s death?

The initial decision to remove badge and firearm was reasonable and appropriate. This is the second questionable situation for the officer. That reality seems to be lost to the police union, and to Mr. Saltzman.

I also think the negotiations should have occurred BEFORE the initial decision was made. The public hates to see this sort of “flip/flop” and it does not bode well for the person doing it.

As for “de-escalation”, if a “no confidence” vote had been made, nothing would have happened afterward. There was no runaway train, the police department would not have evaporated. A disagreement would have been declared (which both sides are entitled to do) and life would have gone on the same for everyone, except that members of communities traditionally at odds with law enforcement would have felt some vindication, that finally someone was listening to them.

Our obsession with “let’s all just get along” and avoiding conflict at all costs is not serving us well with regard to law enforcement issues in the city. Sooner or later the buck stops somewhere, and I thought that is what we elect management to do, take the heat that goes along with doing the right thing, not the expedient thing.

Regards, Ed Garren
Candidate for PDX City Commission, seat #3

www.EdForPDX.com

 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/health/policy/30health.html?emc=eta1

I’m REALLY angry about this one.  

I used the links below to go to their web pages for “letters.”  Then I filled out and wrote a scathing comment about “bought” legislators, etc. into the “comment” section for the first one, then copied and pasted it in for the comments to the rest of them (including Bill Nelson of Florida, the “sold out” Democrat).  

 Those comments are below.Anyway, I eMailed all of the listed in the article senators from their sites.  

I’d suggest if you’re as mad as I am, do the same thing.  Take pointers from my comments below.Here are links to some of the senators who voted “no.”

http://baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=issue

http://carper.senate.gov/contact/webformIQV2.cfm

http://conrad.senate.gov/contact/webformIQV2.cfm

http://lincoln.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

http://grassley.senate.gov/contact.cfm

You can also check out:  http://www.sickforprofit.com

Regards, Ed

*************************My “form” letter is below:

As one of the 48 million Americans who cannot (and never will be able to) afford “private” health insurance (male, over 50, monthly premiums exceed $700 a month) even though I’m “healthy as a horse”, I am mad as hell that you sold out to your buddies in the Health Care industry and rejected the Public Option.

The cost issue is simple. I’ve worked in health care much of my career. The non profit hospitals, where nuns drive Chevrolet’s, have no problem with what Medicare pays.

The private hospitals, where the administrator drives a $70,000 car and gets a huge bonus “can’t afford it”.

What’s wrong with this picture? Making a profit off of sick people, that’s what’s wrong.

In the meantime, millions of us don’t have and will never get health insurance, and you, in your wealth and comfort, don’t give a damn.

I hope they vote your sorry posterior out of office next time. It’s “bought” politicians like you that have ruined this country. You’re supposed to be working for US, not the health care industry.

Regards, Ed Garren, MA, LMFT Psychotherapist

I got an eMail today from an associate.  She is a member of a Portland City Commission, a gentle and loving woman who moves around in a wheel chair.

The eMail had a link to a digital movie short she had made about an incident of discrimination which occurred in her life last fall on an outing with her family.

I have been deeply troubled by that event all day.  I have talked about it with friends.  I remain troubled by the incident, and other recent incidents that have swept into my life in the last month or so.

Another friend, an elderly gay man, who is also wheel chair bound now, had an issue at his dialysis clinic, because he is “sweet” on one of the technicians at the facility.

In his case, he was friendly with the tech, nothing sexual, just trying to make conversation because his entire life consists of going to dialysis and going home.  He is about as harmless as a de-clawed house cat, and probably not long for this world at 77.

For whatever reason the clinic felt it necessary to bring him into the directors office and tell him that his behavior was unacceptable, and that he was to have no further contact with the technician.  The technician had never mentioned anything, expressed any discomfort or concern.  All of a sudden, my friend gets hauled in and dressed down for his harmless conversations.

In tears, he related this story to me, and his sense of betrayal over the situation.  His partner was also deeply hurt and angered and gets sick at the thought of ever going back to the place.

The woman who is mentioned at the beginning shared about how she was bullied out of the event, and her family went on to do the event without her, leaving her in tears outside.

I was shocked, not just that the bullies had run her out, or that her family had not opposed the injustice, but then they went on without her, leaving her alone with her tears.

As I write about this, I want to be very clear that it is not just my associate, or my friend, but a regional malaise, a mental illness if you please that seems to run a heavy thread in most “native” families in the region.

My comments are not meant to be accusatory of her, or her family, or my friend at the dialysis clinic.  This is a systemic issue, a cultural one, and most of us who have moved here from other places, or locals who have lived elsewhere and returned all have the same reaction to it.

Dumbfounded amazement.

This is truly “off the scale” to me.  I just don’t get it.  Not just because of my own sense of personal justice, but our national legacy of “taking a stand”, “sitting in”, and other non violent acts of courage that have formed a more just society.

What if Rosa Parks had cooperated and gotten up and given her seat to the white man on the bus?  After all of the blood shed so that people could live with more dignity, surrendering dignity in order to “get along” makes no sense, and insults those who died so that we could have freedoms.

The “South” is just as polite, just as “family oriented”, and has family roots that run just as deep.  But any of this bullying behavior would be met with a very different response “back home.”  The response would be measured and polite, but firm, “you and what army?”

Surrendering to a bully is the ultimate way to “lose face.”

The south is a culture that spawned the Dixie Chicks song “Good Bye Earl” about two women who poison an abusive husband and dump the body in a lake.  Capitulation is not celebrated, life is too tough.

People out here don’t seem to understand that all of the work of Gandhi and King was “in your face” direct confrontation of an oppressive status quo.  The actions were peaceful, measured and disciplined, but they were also confrontational and combative.  It specifically was civil disobedience, in other words, they broke laws that they believed to be unjust.

I have a wonderful documentary, “The Women of Country Music” about the rise of women in the music business in America.  Few realize that it was these women who were the first to write their own songs and sell millions of them.  They changed the music business forever.

One of the earliest, Patsy Montana, the first woman to sell one million records (”I Want to Be a Cowboy’s Sweetheart”, 1936) shares about how in her career, they tried to pay her less because she was the “girl singer.”  She said, “I stood my ground, I didn’t let them scare me, I stood my ground and I got the cut I was supposed to get.”

In the same documentary, Loretta Lynn states, “you have to toughen up to survive in this business.”  Given the brutalities of current life in America, that seems like good advice for all of us.  What the documentary makes clear is that the only way people get ahead is to feel comfortable fighting for what is important to them.

There seems to be an ethos in the region about confrontation, and the avoidance of it, that makes it very easy for bullies to rule the day.   I would also suggest (as winter and “the rain” approaches) that our region has some of the highest rates of clinical depression in the country.  We blame the weather on it, but I suspect the weather is only a co-factor.

I think a lot of people are depressed because they don’t feel much control over their lives, and human interactions seem to be one long mine field filled with injustice and pain and no acceptable way to protect ones self from assault with one’s own honest anger.

In my private practice, every client I’ve had who is a native of the region (and usually trying to get off of the anti-depressants they have been on for years) comes to the conclusion that he/she has never learned an acceptable way to express anger when someone is hurting them.

So how did we get here?  To this place where we are obsessed with being polite to people who push us around, where we think we are being noble martyrs because we won’t say “No” when we are being treated unfairly?

Family Therapy theory and practice acknowledges the importance of culture with regard to belief systems, particularly regarding human interaction and dealing with people in daily life.  The culture of the Pacific Northwest is legendarily “Conflict Avoidant”, people here will avoid any form of conflict or seemingly adversarial behaviors at all costs.

In the case of my associate, even her family did not object to the way she was being treated, and then went on to the event without her.  My friend at the dialysis clinic was polite in the directors office, agreeing with her, and only when he got in the safety of his car, did he break down and cry over the humiliation of the event.

Depression is “Anger turned inward”, so when someone treats us in a hurtful way, where does our anger go if we don’t express it in the moment when the hurt is inflicted?  We all have a large capacity to absorb pain and process it, but even the largest storage has limits.  When those limits are exceeded, something snaps.  It may be a nervous breakdown, or it may be the guy who goes home and shoots up his family and/or the neighborhood.

Those “Summit Health” ads on TV, “If your anti-depressant alone isn’t working” give me creeps.  How much more “Soma” do you need?

I have lived in three cultures before moving here.  After four years, I still love the place, and the people who live here.  But for the sake of the mental health and the social justice of the region, we need to learn ways to express our anger when we are mis-treated back at the person who is mis-treating us.  Bottling it up inside is a slow poison, that adds to the “grey” of our lives, makes us sick, depressed and unhappy.

In the same documentary, singer Lacy J. Dalton says of the early days of the feminist movement, “I didn’t like the militancy of it.  But as I’ve become older, I’ve really become very understanding of that.  Because unless we really make a fuss sometimes, nobody is gonna listen.”

If you’re unable to defend yourself, can’t stand up for your own personal dignity and justice, then why would anyone else fight on your behalf?

I told my associate that I hope she, her family and friends, go back to the venue this fall, all go in, and if they try to boot her out, make a big ruckus.

Oh, I told her to invite the press too.

“You have to make the injustice visible”  Mohandus Gandhi

Thanks,  Ed Garren

At the risk of incurring the wrath of many of my friends, I agree with the author.  We “liberals” have been too polite, too complicit and too compliant with the onslaught of “conservatives.”  In other words, we have been “lambs” while the wolves have been tearing the country to shreds, devouring the poor, gutting the treasury, and bankrupting the country.

 Is it any wonder that the use of anti-depressant drugs has doubled in the last ten years?

 One of the reasons that Barack Obama has gained so much respect is that when someone attacked him during his campaign, he came right back with an intelligent response.

He continues to engage those with whom he has differences, and while being politically expedient, he has not been politically impotent.

One of the main reasons we “progressives” have not fared well in the last decades is that we are afraid to take on issues, bullies, malcontents and liars.  Barney Frank and Barbara Boxer seem to be the only persons in congress with good old fashioned “balls” and “backbone.”  Maybe it’s because they are both Jewish and understand that when you’re dealing with bullies, you need to fight back, period.

Until we “progressives” are willing to fight back, hard, we will continue to lose ground, which we can no longer afford to do, both for the sake of the nation and the planet.

Here it is, please feel free to comment below.

*******************

To see this story with its related links on the guardian.co.uk site, go tohttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/aug/29/edward-kennedy-democrats-defeat

 Ted Kennedy: a lamb, not a lion

I admired and supported Ted Kennedy ? but he was the symbol of an era when liberals lost the battles that mattered

 Muhammad Cohen

Sunday August 30 2009

guardian.co.uk

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/aug/29/edward-kennedy-democrats-defeat

Ted Kennedy was the champion of the American left during the greatest surge to the right in US political history. Rather than the liberal lion of the Senate, fiercely defending his turf, he was a lamb who failed to halt, and even abetted, the country’s slide away from his principals and ideals. The very word “liberal” morphed from an adjective to an accusation while Ted Kennedy was the keeper of its flame.

I don’t make these charges as one of the legion of Kennedy-haters. Quite the contrary: I’m a proud, card-carrying liberal. My “To sail against the wind” poster, a campaign contribution keepsake from Kennedy’s one and only presidential run in 1980, showing the senator stoutly striding to the left, has graced my walls on three continents. I would have voted for Kennedy over any presidential candidate of the past 40 years, so count me as a true believer.

I don’t blame Kennedy for that 1980 run against Jimmy Carter, a sitting president of his own party. I don’t even blame Kennedy ? although many do ? for Carter’s subsequent defeat at the hands of Ronald Reagan. In 1979, Jimmy Carter threatened: “If Kennedy runs, I’ll whip his ass.” Kennedy let Carter whip his ass, and that’s unforgivable. Though friends and foes alike salute Kennedy’s legislative record, those bills are mere footnotes to the dominant US trend of the past 40 years, a huge ass-whipping for liberals. The Americans With Disabilities Act, No Children Left Behind and the Occupational Safety and Health Act don’t stack up to a single Clarence Thomas or Rush Limbaugh that Kennedy helped create. Kennedy was the leading light on the left during an era when liberals got whipped in every battle that mattered, a loser of historic proportion.

Kennedy didn’t just fail to stem the rightward tide, he helped power it. Through his own personal misconduct, from cheating at Harvard to Chappaquiddick to his binge with William Kennedy Smith of blue-dot rape trial fame, Kennedy exemplified the privileged irresponsibility that fueled the rightwing revolution.

The Kennedy name was said to be magical among liberals, but it became even more effective for conservatives. The mere mention of Ted Kennedy on any issue was enough to open rightwing wallets. For every dollar Kennedy raised for causes he supported, his name probably raised ten times more for causes he opposed. While portraying himself as a champion of the working class, Kennedy financed the movement that convinced millions of Joe the Plumbers to vote against their own interests.

Kennedy became a powerful symbol for his enemies of everything that was wrong with government, liberals, Democrats, and Washington, but failed to use his iconic position to inspire and move his allies. He was the one liberal politician of his time guaranteed a national audience whenever he spoke out. But Kennedy rarely chose to grasp that big stage to galvanize his side and move public opinion on key issues that defined the US over the past four decades.

Where was he on the George Bush the elder’s Supreme Court nomination of Clarence Thomas, the rightwing extremist whose lifetime appointment to the court will have a far greater impact than Kennedy and his brothers combined? When Thomas’ 1991 confirmation hearings deteriorated into a circus with pubic hair on soda cans in the centre ring, where was Kennedy to tell the president and the country that it had to demand someone better? Actually, Kennedy was right there on the Senate Judiciary Committee, gagged by his own string of sexual peccadilloes.

When Thomas cast the vote that made the younger George Bush president, where was Kennedy to say it was wrong in a democracy for nine judges to order vote counting stopped? Where was Kennedy to express liberal outrage at this farce and to lead a movement to refuse to recognise Bush as president until the votes were counted? Why wasn’t he calling on fellow lawmakers to stand and turn their backs whenever they were confronted with this immorally-appointed president?

Well, Kennedy was too busy then crafting the flawed and under-funded No Children Left Behind Act that not only made public education less effective but gave the sham president legitimacy. After asserting Bush betrayed him, Kennedy went back to work again with that same administration on prescription drug coverage for seniors, only to see his support used to create a government handout for drug companies. Fool me twice….

Where was Kennedy’s call for liberals to take to the streets to protest the invasion of Iraq, as they had to end the war in Vietnam? Where was he on the erosion of civil liberties under George Bush? Where was he over the past 40 years on taking meaningful steps to end America’s dependence on imported oil and stop fouling the planet?

Most important, where was Kennedy on the decades-long slide starting with Reagan that transformed government’s mandate and public opinion about the very mission of America? Kennedy’s silence was deafening as Republicans and Democrats alike pandered to business and cut taxes on the wealthy, mocking his brother John’s clarion call in his inaugural speech: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

It’s deeply ironic that Kennedy dies in the midst of a national firestorm over healthcare reform, the cause that he hoped to make his crowning achievement. He leaves the issue mired in the lies and muddle that he didn’t challenge while it spread to poison the national debate. Senior citizens with their social security benefits and Medicare cards stand up at town hall meetings today demanding, “Keep government’s hands off my healthcare,” not only because of Fox News and rightwing radio, but because Ted Kennedy refused to use his mantle to refute the noise and nonsense on the right, leaving it instead of the likes of Al Franken.

Kennedy eschewed that national spotlight to become the consummate Capitol Hill insider. His accomplishments, while noteworthy and substantial, did nothing to counteract the nation’s lurch to the right. He chose to work in the comfortable, clubby confines of the Senate while his team desperately needed a public leader. Perhaps, given the times and trends (though with Watergate, Reagan and his hoodlums, 9/11 and Iraq, the Democrats certainly have had some cards to play), Kennedy drew a Mission: Impossible ? but unlike the fictional agents, Kennedy chose not to accept his mission.

Renowned as an orator, it’s fitting that Kennedy’s best known words have come in tragedy and defeat. There’s this beautiful tribute in his eulogy for Robert Kennedy: “As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him: ‘Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say, why not?’”

After Carter whipped his ass, Kennedy told the 1980 Democratic national convention: “The work goes on, the cause endures, the dream will never die.” In his electrifying appearance at last year’s Democratic party convention in Denver, the stricken Kennedy, whose early support helped Barack Obama secure the presidential nomination, said, “The work begins anew, the hope rises anew, the dream lives on.”

Because of Kennedy’s own failures and flaws, despite nearly half a century in the Senate, so much of what he stood for remains nothing more than dreams.

An earlier version of this article appeared in Asia Times Online.

For those of you who don’t know, my older brother “Gene” is a 28 years of service Army veteran.  He is a retired Sgt. Mjr. the highest enlisted (E-9), was in Special Forces for 17 of those years, did covert military operations for 13 of those 17 years.  When he retired, he spent the last six months of service at Fr. Bragg writing technical manuals for the work that he did, which is still classified so I don’t know much about it.  His tours included Costa Rica, Pakistan, Alaska (north of Arctic Circle), east Africa, and numerous other “missions” that I am not aware of.

Gene is also very concerned about Global Warming/Climate Change.  He has seen the changes first hand during his career.   He has seen retreating glaciers, melting perma-frost, snow capped mountains losing their snow caps, and dwindling water supplies in many areas of the planet.  We have both seen the changes in climate both in our native Florida, and in the mountains of western North Carolina (where he now lives).  The summers in North Carolina are now much hotter than they were when we were children.  I remind him that three times as many people live on the earth as when we were kids, and all of them use fossil fuel, especially here in the United States.

Neither of us are fans of Fox News, but this latest round of lies coming from them has just about sent us both to the brink.  I’ve seen the documentary “Out Foxed” and understand that much of the “information” Fox provides is “spin” and commentary, not factual news.   The fear mongering over health care, climate change, and continuous spewing of lies into the living rooms of millions of viewers is irresponsible journalism at it’s worst.

My brother wrote this eMail to them recently, referring to them as the “Propaganda Network:

 Hello.  I am a 100% service connected disabled retired combat veteran.  Since President Obama began his campaign and has become President I can relate 3 issues that give favor to him as to Disabled Veterans.

1. President Obama supports full concurrent receipt of disabled military retirees military retirement and VA disability pay.  At present on those of us who are fully 100% or being paid at the 100% rate under the unemployable clause are getting full concurrent receipt.  The rest 50% or higher are still having it phased in while those below still have not such legislation.

2. President Obama supported what is now law on the New enhanced GI Bill brought forth by 2 tour combat Vietnam veteran Senator Jim Webb of Virginia.

3. President Obama has asked for a 16 billion increase in this years VA budget, the most in over 30 years.

Yet now that he tries to help the 40 million Americans who have not health insurance, all kinds of half truths, distortions, deception, and out and out lies are being told reference this.  I know many disabled combat veterans who are between   50 and 70 % disabled who simply cannot work no can they afford a supplement to their Medicare A&B. Therefore they really have nothing outside the VA which while doing all it can with the resources it has which is not always enough to meet the need.

Yet your so called “news” network allows Sean Hannity to have his own biased radio talk show and then present himself on Fox news as a radio reporter.  

This is wrong and I do not know why this is allowed.  In the days of Walter Cronkite, Charles Collingwood, David Brinkley, Chet Huntley, Edward R. Murrow, Qunten Renalds, and others this would not have been allowed.

In short your News network is only there to support greedy CEO’s and industries who have not the people’s best interests at heart, but increasing their greedy bank accounts such as Big Oil, Big Coal, Many in the Health Care industry, and others.

This shows that with enough money any large corporation can buy off many in Congress and also buy their own propaganda New network, radio shows, and internet web sites.Yet Fox news tries to put on a front that they stand behind the American working person.

This is totally false.  Your network is a total disgrace to all the American veterans who have given their lives in the service of their country.It is my sincere hope that someday you be uncovered for who you really are.  You stand against everything that makes and has made this country great and are a total disgrace to yourselves, your families, the United States of America, and mankind.

He added this in a note to me:  I am up to it with Fox News and all the others who keep sending me this bull s**t anti Obama and the health plan stuff.  One Congressman got up in the Congress and was lambasting it all and accused Obama’s administration of penalizing the 80% who have health insurance for the 40% who have not “EARNED” health insurance.  I guess some of my combat veteran friends who can’t afford health insurance didn’t earn it.  I think they earned it far more than that a** hole who I doubt ever was in service, must less combat. 

Fox News, is is owned by Rupert Murdoch, an ultra “right wing” Republican.  He has made Fox  network his personal mouthpiece for the agenda of greed, the fossil fuel cartel, make the United States into a third world country, destroy the middle class, etc.  These are the same people who gutted the treasury and the country for the last 8 years.  They are trying to stir up confusion and lies to defeat the “public OPTION” (not mandate) for health care that is now in congress.

Their motto “Fair and Balanced” is the first lie they perpetrate, they are neither.

You can add some comments to this if you like, just press the “Comments/No Comments” link at the bottom.

A friend sent him this link from the Sierra Club for a petition, you might want to sign it as well.

https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=2837&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr001=63ykz0n755.app224a